Thursday, March 10, 2016

A Review of Our March 1st Life Insurance Event

For those of you who hadn't heard, we conducted a life insurance informational meeting last Tuesday. If you missed out on this event, be sure to register with our website by clicking here so you can stay up to date on all of our beneficial meetings and presentations!


Monday, February 29, 2016

How Using a Fact-Finder Can Make You a Cross-Selling Expert

In the insurance industry, it is very easy for agents to become single-product oriented. Instead of providing a variety of product types such as Medicare, Individual Major Medical, Life Insurance, and Ancillary, most agents find it easier to become an expert in one category and ignore the rest. This, of course, limits the amount of income you stand to make. If you haven't heard the term "cross-selling" preached to you a million times then you have probably been living under a rock. We all KNOW we should cross-sell, but there lies a gap between the intention and the execution. This is where the handy dandy fact-finder comes in.


It may seem a little exaggerated to say that a fact-finder can effectively work to suddenly change your habits from focusing on one or two products to being a cross-selling success story. However, it truly is the first step, and by using this tool you may find that opportunities to cross-sell present themselves to you as you go. Here is the process of using the fact-finder and how different elements of the process can increase your sales.

Monday, February 22, 2016

Life Insurance Isn't Complicated

The phrase "everyone is unique" certainly holds true when considering how much life insurance you need.  However, life insurance does not have to be complicated.  The industry has taken some major steps in recent months to make the writing and issuing of policies much quicker and simpler.


There are three main types of life insurance to know as a starting out point:

Thursday, February 18, 2016

CMS Increases ACA Oversight & Wants to Classify Provider Networks

What can we expect from CMS in 2017?  More oversight, that is what.  CMS intends to take on a bigger regulatory role in reviewing ACA premium rates and categorizing provider networks for qualified health plans (QHPs) offered via the 36 insurance exchanges that rely on the federal platform.



Monday, February 15, 2016

Your Next Step?

Okay, it’s February.  Open enrollments periods for Medicare and ACA product have long since closed.  The bloom is off the rose of most New Year’s resolutions.  And Valentine’s Day is more of a made-up holiday to sell flowers and greeting cards than insurance.  So what does a well-qualified, filled-with-good intentions agent do?

Thursday, February 11, 2016

CMS Wants Bigger Role in Rate Review

Under the ACA, exchange administrators are required to consider rate increases when making certification decisions. Previously, CMS flagged so-called “outlier” rates, which were substantially higher than others, and then asked that state’s department of insurance to provide a rationale for approving the increase. The agency often deferred to states in allowing substantial rate increases. When carriers submit initial 2017 rates this year, however, CMS proposes conducting a rate review of QHP increases over 10% according to the letter.
State regulators and carriers could push back on the proposal. A spokesperson for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners declined to comment until after it submits comments to CMS. CMS is the sole rate reviewer in five states — Alabama, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming —which opposed the ACA and didn’t want to play a role in approving QHP rates. Regulators in those five states actively review proposed rates only for products outside of the exchanges. CMS could potentially use the same rate-review process for other FFE states if the proposal is finalized.
For the 2017 plan year, carriers must submit their applications and rate filings between April 11 and May 11. Final submission of all QHP data and permitted changes are due to CMS on Aug. 23.
CMS also appears to be moving to more of a parallel regulatory structure with state insurance departments when it comes to the oversight of agents and brokers, based on the letter and the BPP.

Monday, February 8, 2016

Federally Facilitated Exchanges No Longer Temporary

The administration has gradually moved away from the ACA’s goal of encouraging Federally Facilitated Exchange (FFE) states to stand up their own State-based Exchanges (SBEs). The ACA was written with state-based exchanges as the primary model, and the federal platform was expected to be a temporary solution for most states.
The agency, for example, offers no new encouragement for a state to switch to a state-based model or to preserve SBE status. The agency also proposes making it more expensive for SBEs that want to shift some functions to the federal platform. Some industry observers expect more SBEs will move to the FFE model entirely or move to a partnership model.